Thread:Ralok/@comment-804628-20120423024504/@comment-804628-20120424061926

That works for me, but by establishing the method for displaying the retconn info in advance and making it plainly available (although clearly separated) you don't leave the opportunity for someone to come in and feel the need to revamp. They won't 'need to' because the stuff they think should be there is already covered in your format.

I keep using LordTJs eyeshine page as an example, because if I didn't know he agreed with the retcoon, I would have never guessed based on that page. It started with an explanation of 'eyeshine' - some fascinating info about how animal retinal linings shine lending real life scientific support to the supposition that in the future a human's eye could possibly be surgically altered with a synthetic lining to enhance night vision. This was followed by the original origin which included many of the supporting links to the canon sources.

The retconn (or 'Behind the Scenes" as he called it) was a separate section on the same page under the original -- like a follow up added on later, which it technically was. It was really a pretty honest page, and the when put together like that, it was pretty obvious which origin was the best supported (but if a user followed the retconn, they couldn't complain - it was there too).